Luxury's best marketing strategy isn't marketing

A ten-foot ball of human hair rolled through Manhattan last month. The strangest thing about it was that it was real.

That, in its own odd way, is the thread running through this issue: A family on Lake Como insists their hotel was never really theirs. A generation trusts the last guest's review over the name on the building. A beauty brand won a news cycle with the sweepings from salon floors.

It’s the real, human, hard-to-justify stuff that’s quietly outselling the expensive kind. That’s why it worked.

We’re a clear fan of luxury hospitality, but reading The Stanaza’s article mentioning the family luxury hotel Passalacqua solidified why. The family who runs it describe themselves not as ‘owners’ of a property but as ‘their caretakers’. And they’re not alone. Ana Andjelic recently wrote about the CEO of Airelles, quoting their approach that every decision starts with whether it will create a memory a guest still talks about years later. What makes this so interesting is that they’re not describing a metric on utilisation or sales, which of course matter, but they’re describing a whole new way of operating a brand.

If you think like a manager, you’re optimising the period you are accountable for. If you act like a caretaker, you are adopting a discipline, a practice in nurturing a feeling and legacy to be left behind.

And what gets measured gets done. Airelles shifts budget from marketing to dedicating an entire team on gifting, they take more time to prepare a room. For Passalacqua it’s preserving the soul of a private home over a luxury resort, which, in this instance, meant resisting expansion despite being named best hotel in the world.

And Andjelic’s piece explains why that now pays. Generosity is a pull instrument, it gets recounted and retold (that elusive word of mouth). So instead of focusing on ‘push’ metrics, consider the pull. How do we use a caretaker philosophy in our next brand plans? And what stories are you looking to delight your audiences with? And importantly, how will the sum of all this be remembered?

Hotels are investing heavily in lifestyle brands designed to win younger travellers, but Gen Z may be looking elsewhere. 61% say reviews influence where they book, compared with just 14% for the brand name and 12% for social media. Even free breakfast matters to 56%. Turns out the review from the last guest might be doing more selling than the brand above the door.

Spate's trend data says maximalism is compounding. Bedazzling is up 180% year on year, whimsical aesthetic up 81%, and TikTok is doing the heavy lifting. So, let’s settle it:

📌 Two hotel brands picked Australia in the same month, at opposite ends of the market

Anantara chose Perth for its Australian debut the same month Accor's value brand greet landed in Alice Springs. One month doesn't make a trend, but two international debuts in 30 days suggests Australia is on more than one operator's expansion map right now.

📌 Singapore's Michelin list rewarded the restaurant with the local story

The new Michelin Guide Singapore handed a two-star debut to 1887 by André, a restaurant built from Raffles' own history, while hotel dining rooms fronted by imported names took one star or none. A famous name on the door still counts for less than a story that belongs to the building.

📌Australia's first escape-room restaurant is in Melbourne

Here a wealthy fictional chef Frida Crouton has died and guests crack food-based puzzles over three courses to determine their share of her fortune. Melbourne dining keeps drifting from menu to narrative and now the format is the marketing.

📌 Nearly three in four Gen Z have punished a brand over AI marketing

AI might be all the talk, but the audience with the most sway is holding it accountable. Rival Technologies puts numbers on it: 72% of Gen Z have taken action against a brand after spotting AI-generated marketing. Half unfollowed, 49% complained, 48% unsubscribed and 43% stopped buying. Only 8% reacted well.

K18 spent months asking its partner salons to save what usually gets swept away, the ends and trimmings from thousands of haircuts, until there was enough to sew into a ball ten feet across. Then it rolled the thing through New York. The Tumblehair, as the brand named it, launched K18's FutureIQ hair-loss serum, and the size was doing the arithmetic: the product claims to save around 19,000 hairs per head, which across 8.5 million New Yorkers comes to 161 billion strands. A team of handlers pushed it through Midtown, Chinatown and the Meatpacking District before it came to rest outside Sephora, where passers-by could touch it, photograph it and sit for a scalp analysis. K18 didn't claim the stunt on its own channels at first, preferring to let strangers ask what it was. Disgust was welcome. "Whatever emotional reaction it gives you, you're still going to talk about it," says CMO Kleona Mack.

The instructive part is why it worked in 2026. Audiences now assume anything strange online is AI, and the surprise was that this wasn't. When Maybelline ran its CGI mascara stunt on the London Underground in 2023, fooling people was the trick. Three years on, being real is. Like the caretakers above, K18 bet that the thing people can actually touch travels furthest, and roughly $150K in earned media says the bet paid.

If someone in your world would find this useful, forward it on, or they can subscribe at weareexample.com/subscribe.

I’m a Dubai-based travel lifestyle content creator. I enjoy discovering new places, keeping up with what’s happening around the world, and exploring different sides of food, entertainment, travel, and everyday life. Also, founder of “3in Dubai” website (Eye of Dubai) https://3indubai.com.